首页> 外文OA文献 >Worm control practice against gastro-intestinal parasites in Norwegian sheep and goat flocks
【2h】

Worm control practice against gastro-intestinal parasites in Norwegian sheep and goat flocks

机译:挪威绵羊和山羊群中针对胃肠道寄生虫的蠕虫控制实践

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Background Anthelmintic treatment is the most common way of controlling nematode infections in ruminants. However, several countries have reported anthelmintic resistance (AR), representing a limitation for sustainable small ruminant production. The knowledge regarding worm control management represents a baseline to develop a guideline for preventing AR. The aim of the present study was therefore to improve our knowledge about the worm control practices in small ruminant flocks in Norway. Methods A questionnaire survey regarding worm control practices was performed in small ruminant flocks in Norway. Flocks were selected from the three main areas of small ruminant farming, i.e. the coastal, inland and northern areas. A total of 825 questionnaires, comprising 587 sheep flocks (return rate of 51.3%) and 238 goat flocks (52.6%) were included. Results The results indicated that visual appraisal of individual weight was the most common means of estimating the anthelmintic dose used in sheep (78.6%) and goat (85.1%) flocks. The mean yearly drenching rate in lambs and ewes were 2.5 ± 1.7 and 1.9 ± 1.1, respectively, whereas it was 1.0 (once a year) in goats. However, these figures were higher in sheep in the coastal area with a rate of 3.4 and 2.2 in lambs and ewes, respectively. Benzimidazoles were the predominant anthelmintic class used in sheep flocks (64.9% in 2007), whereas benzimidazoles and macrocyclic lactones were both equally used in dairy goat flocks. In the period of 2005-2007, 46.3% of the sheep flocks never changed the anthelmintic class. The dose and move strategy was practiced in 33.2% of the sheep flocks. Conclusions The present study showed that inaccurate weight calculation gives a risk of under-dosing in over 90% of the sheep and goat flocks in Norway. Taken together with a high treatment frequency in lambs, a lack of anthelmintic class rotation and the common use of a dose-and-move strategy, a real danger for development of anthelmintic resistance (AR) seems to exist in Norwegian sheep and goat flocks. This risk seems particularly high in coastal areas where high treatment frequencies in lambs were recorded
机译:背景技术驱虫治疗是控制反刍动物中线虫感染的最常见方法。但是,一些国家报告了驱虫抗药性(AR),这代表了可持续的小反刍动物生产的局限性。有关蠕虫控制管理的知识是制定预防AR指南的基线。因此,本研究的目的是提高我们对挪威小型反刍动物群中蠕虫控制方法的了解。方法在挪威的小反刍动物群中进行了有关蠕虫控制方法的问卷调查。从反刍动物养殖的三个主要区域(即沿海,内陆和北部地区)中选择了羊群。共纳入825份问卷,包括587只羊群(回报率为51.3%)和238只羊群(52.6%)。结果结果表明,目视评估体重是评估绵羊(78.6%)和山羊(85.1%)鸡群所用驱虫剂量的最常用方法。羔羊和母羊的年平均淋水率分别为2.5±1.7和1.9±1.1,而山羊为1.0(一年一次)。然而,沿海地区绵羊的这些数字更高,羔羊和母羊的比率分别为3.4和2.2。苯并咪唑是羊群中使用的主要驱虫药类(2007年为64.9%),而苯并咪唑和大环内酯在乳品山羊群中均被同等使用。在2005-2007年期间,有46.3%的羊群从未改变过驱虫等级。在33.2%的羊群中采用了剂量和移动策略。结论本研究表明,不正确的体重计算会给挪威90%以上的绵羊和山羊群饲喂剂量不足的风险。加上羔羊的高治疗频率,缺乏驱虫药类别轮换以及普遍采用的剂量移动战略,挪威绵羊和山羊群似乎存在着产生驱虫药抗性(AR)的真正危险。在沿海地区,羔羊的治疗频率很高,这种风险似乎特别高

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号